Government procurement
A bounded path from first conversation to a 90-day pilot.
Mission outcomes. Named measures. Manageable implementation risk.
Government buyers do not need another feature list. They need a sequenced path: confirm the problem, inspect security language, take a capability package, and run a bounded evaluation that keeps humans in command of adjudication.
Fast track
Four moves. Then a bounded evaluation.
01 · Discovery
Confirm the evidence-defect problem, the human-in-command constraint, and whether a pilot is even the right instrument.
02 · Security review
Zero-trust posture, audit logging, Azure Government design, FedRAMP Moderate alignment in progress — stated as alignment, not an ATO.
03 · Capability package
Capability statement, named KPIs, and a 90-day scope. SAM.gov registration is current. UEI/CAGE on SAM.gov.
04 · Bounded pilot
Evidence First-Pass Yield, gaps named pre-submission, rework, traceability, human override. Results published only when defensible.
Procurement checklist
Vendor status
Registered on SAM.gov. UEI, CAGE, and NAICS live on SAM.gov — not restated here to avoid transcription error.
Leave-behind
Capability statement PDF plus this procurement sequence. Proprietary scoring internals are not published.
Security language
Trust Center and Security door use alignment language. FedRAMP is in progress. Not an authorization to operate.
Evaluation instrument
A 90-day named-KPI pilot. Expansion is earned after measurement, not assumed at kickoff.
- SAM.gov registered vendor
- Capability statement available for download
- 90-day pilot with named measures
- No invented public ROI
- Humans stay in command of adjudication